What distinguishes Casual homicide from Justifiable homicide?

Casual homicide and justifiable homicide are distinguished primarily by the intent involved in the actions leading to the death. In the case of casual homicide, there is an intent to harm, although it may not be premeditated. This means that while the individual did not necessarily plan the act ahead of time, they acted with a disregard for human life or a conscious decision to cause harm, which results in someone's death.

On the other hand, justifiable homicide occurs when a person kills another in lawful defense, where the act is considered legally permissible. This typically involves scenarios where an individual believes they are in imminent danger and acts to protect themselves or others, without the intent to cause harm beyond defending oneself.

The nuances in these definitions help clarify the significant moral and legal implications each type of homicide carries. Casual homicide can lead to criminal charges, as it involves an element of recklessness or intent to cause harm, while justifiable homicide might not lead to charges at all, as it is viewed as an acceptable and legal response to a threat.